Placeholder Banner

BIO: Delay of R&D Tax Burden is Positive Step, Permanent Repeal Still Needed

June 15, 2023

The House Ways & Means Committee has approved a bill that includes language to delay retroactively through 2025 the mandatory capitalization of research and development expenses, which took effect in tax year 2022. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 replaced the ability to deduct R&D expenses immediately from taxes with five-year amortization. The following statement concerning the committee’s action may be attributed to Nick Shipley, chief advocacy officer for BIO.  

“BIO thanks the House Ways & Means Committee for addressing the critical issue of R&D expensing. Restoring immediate expensing of R&D expenditures is critical to prevent an innovation-killing tax burden on biotech companies, including those working to develop the biomedical breakthroughs that patients need. Tax policy should incentivize, not penalize, investments in R&D to meet the world’s challenges, from antimicrobial resistance, pandemic preparedness and rare disease, to food security, climate resiliency and growing the nation’s bioeconomy. 

“The committee’s action to delay the mandatory amortization requirement by four years is a welcome first step to address this issue. BIO urges Congress to continue working to enact full and permanent restoration of this vital incentive for innovation.” 

Discover More
BIO President & CEO John F. Crowley released the following statement:“A healthy and prosperous society is vitally important to the American people and to the world. The public health, economic security and our national security are best served…
“The Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) applauds today's announcement from the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) expanding the scope of biotechnology exemptions for modified plants under 7 CFR part 340. This…
BIO strongly supports a manufacturer’s ability to use a 340B rebate as an appropriate option to make 340B pricing available to covered entities."Manufacturers should have the choice to effectuate 340B pricing in the manner they deem most efficient…